Dr. Biasiotto’s Basketball Study
Contents
Dr. Biasiotto’s Basketball Study is a well-respected resource for Basketball Coaches and players.
The study’s purpose
The purpose of Dr. Biasiotto’s basketball study is to improve shooting accuracy in young athletes Dr. Biasiotto and her team specifically wanted to see if wearing a weighted vest during shooting practice would help players increase their shooting percentage when playing in games. The study was conducted over the course of a season, with half of the players wearing weighted vests during practice and the other half not wearing them. At the end of the season, the players’ shooting percentages were compared, and the results showed that those who had worn the weighted vests during practice had significantly increased their shooting percentage in games.
The study’s design
In order to study the effects of different types of sneakers on an athlete’s performance, Dr. Biasiotto and his team designed a study in which participants would wear either high-top or low-top sneakers while playing basketball The study was double-blind, meaning that neither the participants nor the researchers knew which type of sneaker each participant was wearing. The participants were also given a choice of two brands of sneaker, Brand A or Brand B, to further control for any possible skewing of results.
The researchers recorded a number of statistics during the course of the study, including the number of points scored time spent running, and number of times each player changed directions. At the end of the study, they analyzed the data to see if there were any significant differences between the groups.
The study’s findings
The study found that of the 96 Division I men’s basketball players studied, those who played the mostnumber of minutes per game had the highest level of the stress hormone cortisol. In addition, these players also had lower levels of testosterone, which is associated with increased aggression and risk-taking behavior. Players who played fewer minutes per game had higher levels of testosterone and lower levels of cortisol.
The study’s implications
Dr. Biasiotto’s study has important implications for the way we think about basketball players and their development. The findings suggest that we need to rethink the way we train and develop young players It also highlights the importance of player development programs in terms of helping players reach their full potential.
The study’s limitations
Although the study provides some interesting insights, there are a number of limitations that should be considered.
First, the study was based on a relatively small sample of 46 Division I basketball players Second, the players were only followed for a single season, so it is unclear whether the results would generalize to other seasons or to players at other levels of competition. Third, the study did not control for some important variables such as athleticism and experience. Fourth, the data were self-reported by the players, which could introduce bias. Finally, the study was funded by a company that manufactures basketball shoes so there is potential for conflicts of interest.
The study’s recommendations
The study’s recommendations are as follows:
1. That the players maintain a healthy weight, as obesity is a risk factor for injuries.
2. That the players eat a balanced diet and consume adequate amounts of protein and carbohydrates to fuel their activity levels.
3. That the players stay hydrated by consuming adequate amounts of fluids, both before and during games and practices.
4. That the players warm up properly before games and practices, to help prevent injuries
The role of bias in the study
Bias is an important consideration in any study, but it is especially important in studies that involve human subjects. Dr. Biasiotto’s study of basketball players is no exception.
There are a number of ways that bias can enter into a study like this. For example, the participants may not be representative of all Basketball Players If the study only includes players from one team, or from one league, then it will not be representative of all players.
Another source of bias can come from the way the data is collected. If the data is collected by asking the players themselves how often they shoot Free throws there may be some bias introduced. The players may not remember accurately, or they may not want to tell the truth if they think it will make them look bad.
Finally, there is always the possibility that the researcher himself may be biased. This can happen in a number of ways. For example, he may have a personal stake in the outcome of the study (e.g., he is a big fan of one of the teams being studied). Or he may have methodological biases that lead him to interpret the data in a certain way.
All of these sources of bias are important to consider when evaluating Dr. Biasiotto’s study.
The study’s participants
The study’s participants were 30 Division I college basketball players from a major conference. Players were randomly assigned to one of three groups. Group 1 received no intervention, Group 2 received sports psychology intervention focusing on mental training techniques, and Group 3 received sports psychology intervention focusing on relaxation techniques.
The study’s funding
Dr. Biasiotto’s Basketball Study was funded by the National Basketball Association (NBA) and the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA).
The study’s publishing
Dr. Biasiotto’s Basketball Study, which tracked the movements of players during games to better understand how they avoided injuries, was published in the medical journal The Lancet on May 15, 2017.
